Wednesday, June 20, 2012

WK14-15: Project Three Final Submission - Summary Statement

The theoretical notion of prosthetic architecture is a relatively pre-existent concept. However by combining such notions with architecturally responsive exoskeleton design principles are we able to begin defining architectural schemes which are no longer static representations of an individual’s needs, but rather a responsive extension.
The scheme presented within this presentation, titled “Prothetique” (French for prosthetic, hence drawn from prosthetics origins within the French medical discourse) is one which begins to explore the notion of a responsive architectural exoskeleton, prosthetically defined through the pure existence of occupants upon each floor of a central tower. Such allows for the development of an organic architectural form which contorts our pre-conceived notions of architecture space and order.
The scheme responds to the brief put forth by Sydney Council as part of the 2030 master plan for the city by combining three sectors; residential, commercial and retail within a single proposal occupying the corner of Castlereagh, King and Pitt Street. The foundation of the main tower, consisting five levels is a physical retail extension of the currently evident shopping district of the CBD centred on Pitt Street. A structure defined by unique dual facade portrays a conceptual and static extraction of the towers floors perpendicular to the exoskeleton. While the 25 storey tower defined by the prosthetic exoskeleton consists of commercial office space upon the lower floors, and residential units throughout the upper levels.
The exoskeleton, defined vertically through horizontal plane co-ordinates ranging between an inner and outer minimum and maximum, directly responds to the density of the occupants upon each floor and more particularly their position within the eight equal segments which form each floor. Thus when the density within a segment increases, the exoskeleton responds by moving perpendicularly outwards, drawing with it the floor and any attached walls with it in order to create additional space. The physical extension of the exoskeleton may be defined separately by the occupants, or may contort to the system developed for the scheme, which calculates the relative extension as a proportion of the estimated floor density.
The proposed system, parametrically developed within Rhinoceros and Grasshopper utilises modern architectural form development technologies to create a variably definable structure. Parametrics within this scheme allows the inner and outer boundary of each floor to be manipulated as well as the response of a density shift. Further, basic constraints such as floor height and spacing between each are able to be manipulated accordingly. While the number of floors and curvilinear responsiveness of the exoskeleton are further able to be adjusted, while remaining all interconnected.
The benefits and rationale for pursuing such a scheme are quite varied, however this particular project, beyond improving the quality of life for occupants of the tower by defining space directly through their spatial existence, identifies numerous eco-friendly benefits. Hence by directly defining space as an extension of density, energy is no longer wasted lighting, heating or cooling space which is not used at any one time. Further, due to the independently moving nature of each floor an external space is formed, of a height definable through further analysis, allowing natural access to lighting throughout the floor, as well as natural ventilation.

WK14-15: Project Three Final Submission - Final Presentation Poster


The image above presents my final project three poster presentation outlining my scheme. The poster incorporates visual renders of the numerous iterations as well as various description drawings outlining the conceptual operation of the proposed scheme.

WK14-15: Project Three Final Submission - Final Iteration Renders


The collection of images presented above represents my final collection of iterations regarding project three. They are divided into sets (rows), with three versions of each. Each set portrays a variation of the defined parameters, while each variation portrays an iteration due to the movement of people within the floor over time.

WK14-15: Project Three Final Submission - Grasshopper

The collection of images below outlines my final grasshopper scheme for project three. The images outline each stage of operation. Please note I was unable to produce a single image, as the exporter kept crashing due to the size of the file.

Stage One


Stage Two


Stage Three


Stage Four

Stage Five

Stage Six

Stage Seven

Thursday, May 3, 2012

WK6-9: Laser Cutting Test

The image above presents the two laser cut tests I completed. The top three images present the main experiment, with the lower one a second experiment considering different shape cams. The basic idea about these experiments was to test whether my idea of using elastic upon rotating cams to portray a contorting surface would work. The result was a fail, due to the excess tension which existed, limiting the rotation of elements. Therefore further testing is required considering different shape cams and elastic materials. While the image below presents the main file I used to cut the main test.


WK6-9: Grasshopper Experimentation Summary



The image above presents the latest version of my grasshopper file. It was a little difficult to post all experimentation files, simply due to the complexity of my project and the slight changes which occur. Thus such changes are only truly noticed by the creator due to these reasons.

WK6-9: Tier Two - 2 Additional Linkage Sources

Source One: Simulation-Based Design of Exoskeletons using Musculoskeletal Analysis -

Agarwal, P., Narayanan, M., Lee, L., Mendel, F & Krovi, V 2010, ‘Simulation-Based Design of Exoskeletons using Musculoskeletal Analysis’, ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 1-8.

Source Two: Post-spatial Architectures: The emergence of time like parametric worlds -

Senagala, M 2003, ‘Post-spatial Architectures: The emergence of time like parametric worlds’, SIGraDi, University of Texas at San Antonio, pp. 42-49.